TBM Modeling Allocation Methods
Technology Business Management (TBM) requires more than tracking expenses—it demands assigning costs in a fair, transparent, and scalable way. This is especially important for the analysts, modelers, and administrators tasked with building and maintaining TBM models. These practitioners must ensure that costs are attributed to the correct consumers and services, and that the logic used is both understandable and defendable. Cost allocation is the process of distributing expenses across consumers, services, or business units based on a logical and justifiable basis. Whether working in commercial TBM software or spreadsheets, practitioners must make cost flows traceable, relevant, and sustainable.
This page outlines when and how to perform cost allocation in a TBM model, provides in-depth guidance on common allocation methods, and helps practitioners assess the quality of their allocations.
What Is Cost Allocation?
In TBM, cost allocation refers to distributing a source expense—such as data center operations, software licensing, or shared services—to the consuming objects in the TBM model. This could include towers, sub-towers, applications, business units, or services. Allocations rely on drivers or rules that reflect actual consumption, value delivered, or an equitable split.
An allocation rule takes cost from a source and distributes it to one or more targets using a defined driver (e.g., user count, storage volume, or revenue contribution). The goal is to make this distribution traceable, defensible, relevant, consistent, and scalable—even as complexity increases.
When Are Cost Allocations Needed?
Allocations occur throughout the TBM model lifecycle. Below are five common—but not exhaustive—instances where cost allocations are required:
1. Mapping Costs to IT Towers
Most costs will not naturally arrive with Tower/Sub-Tower designations. Allocations are used to assign shared infrastructure, network, and service costs to the appropriate IT Towers. Visit our Mapping Costs to Resource Towers page to learn more about this process.
2. Allocating Shared Infrastructure Costs
Costs such as servers, storage, and networks must often be distributed across the applications, services, or business units that use them.
3. Mapping to Applications and Services
Labor, vendor, or shared costs often support multiple apps. Allocations are used to assign these costs accurately to each application or service.
4. Allocating Internal Services or Overhead
Functions like the help desk, PMO, or security operations must be distributed to their beneficiaries. Allocations ensure those costs are reflected in the total cost of downstream services.Visit our Mapping Costs to Solutions page to learn more about this process.
5. Assigning Costs to Business Units (Showback/Chargeback)
Once technology costs are mapped to services or solutions, they must often be attributed to the business units consuming them. Allocation ensures that internal consumers are accountable for their portion of the cost. Visit our Showback/Chargeback page to learn more about this process.
Common Allocation Methods
The following allocation methods are common across TBM models. Each method varies in complexity, data requirements, and alignment to TBM model maturity. As your model grows, you’ll likely use more than one method across different layers or domains.
Direct Allocation
Direct allocation involves assigning costs directly to specific consumers based on measurable usage or consumption metrics. It is ideal for costs that can be easily traced to individual users or services without ambiguity. This method is typically associated with early-stage TBM model maturity where simplicity and transparency are prioritized over intricate cost analysis.
Example:
A software development company allocates the cost of a specialized software license used exclusively by the Mobile App Development team. The annual license cost is $10,000, and there are 5 developers in the team.
Cost per developer = $10,000 / 5 = $2,000 per developer per year
Advantages:
- Simplicity: Easy to implement and understand.
- Transparency: Clear linkage between cost and consumer.
Challenges:
- Limited Scope: Does not account for shared resources or indirect costs effectively.
Activity-Based Costing (ABC)
Definition: Activity-Based Costing assigns costs based on specific activities or processes that consume resources. It identifies cost drivers (activities) and allocates costs according to the intensity of resource usage. This method aims to accurately reflect the true cost of delivering services and is associated with moderate to high TBM model maturity.
Example: In a data center, electricity costs are allocated based on the power consumption of each server rack. If the total annual electricity cost for the data center is $100,000 and Server Rack A consumes 20% of the total power, its allocated cost would be:
Allocated cost for Server Rack A = $100,000 × 0.20 = $20,000 per year
Advantages:
- Granularity: Provides detailed insights into cost drivers.
- Accuracy: Reflects actual resource consumption.
Challenges:
- Complexity: Requires substantial effort to identify and allocate costs.
- Data Dependency: Relies on accurate data regarding resource usage.
Fixed Cost Allocation
Definition: Fixed cost allocation distributes fixed costs evenly across business units or services based on predetermined percentages or formulas. It ensures equitable distribution of fixed expenses among different departments or units. Fixed cost allocation is commonly associated with early to moderate-stage TBM model maturity, providing predictability in budgeting and financial planning by distributing fixed expenses uniformly.
Example: A company’s administrative overhead costs, including office rent and utilities, total $500,000 per year. The costs are allocated to three departments based on their respective headcounts:
- Department A: 50 employees
- Department B: 30 employees
- Department C: 20 employees
Using headcount as the allocation basis:
Allocation per employee = $500,000 / 100 = $5,000
Department A = 50 × $5,000 = $250,000
Department B = 30 × $5,000 = $150,000
Department C = 20 × $5,000 = $100,000
Advantages:
- Predictability: Facilitates stable budgeting and financial planning.
- Equity: Ensures each department contributes based on a standardized formula.
Challenges:
- Rigidity: May not reflect actual usage patterns.
- Adjustment Requirements: Requires periodic adjustments to remain fair and accurate.
Shared Services Allocation
Definition: Shared services allocation distributes costs incurred by centralized IT or administrative services across various business units or departments that benefit from these services. It allocates costs based on proportional usage or agreed-upon allocation metrics. Shared services allocation becomes more relevant in moderate to high TBM model maturity stages, emphasizing efficiency and transparency by distributing costs based on actual usage of shared resources.
Example: A company’s IT department provides centralized network infrastructure and support services to three departments: Sales, Finance, and HR. The total annual cost of these services is $300,000, and their usage distribution is:
- Sales: 40% → $120,000
- Finance: 30% → $90,000
- HR: 30% → $90,000
Advantages:
- Efficiency: Optimizes resource usage through centralized services.
- Clarity: Provides transparency in cost allocation.
Challenges:
- Complexity: Determining proportional usage can be challenging.
- Dependency: Relies on accurate tracking of service consumption.
Weighted Allocation
Definition: Weighted allocation assigns costs based on predetermined weighting factors that reflect the relative consumption or benefit derived by different business units or services. It allows customization based on specific business priorities or performance metrics. Weighted allocation is typically associated with moderate to high TBM model maturity stages, offering flexibility and alignment with strategic objectives by basing cost allocations on key performance metrics.
Example: A company allocates marketing expenses based on revenue contribution from different product lines:
- Product Line A (60%) = $120,000
- Product Line B (40%) = $80,000
Total marketing budget: $200,000
Advantages:
- Flexibility: Allows adaptation to strategic objectives and business priorities.
- Alignment: Aligns cost allocations with performance metrics.
Challenges:
- Subjectivity: Choosing appropriate weighting factors can be subjective.
Complexity: Requires careful management to ensure fairness and accuracy.
Red Flags: Poor Allocations
- Hard-coded flat percentages (“50/50 split”)
- No consumption or usage data (“just divide by number of apps”)
- Costs dumped into ‘unallocated’ or ‘shared services’ with no follow-through
- Manual overrides without documentation
- Model crashes when a new app or tower is added
Managing Allocation Exceptions
Some costs defy standard allocation logic. These exceptions, if left unchecked, can undermine trust in the TBM model. Managing them effectively involves two tightly related approaches: fallback rules and the handling of fallout costs.
Fallback Rules
Fallback rules exist to ensure continuity when primary drivers are missing, late, or flawed. These rules are particularly helpful when data sources are not yet mature, or when building initial TBM models under time constraints. They allow the model to execute fully, but must be clearly marked and regularly reevaluated.
Fallbacks typically rely on simpler allocation drivers like headcount or number of applications, but should only be used temporarily. The TBM team should actively work to replace them with primary, more accurate rules over time. Documentation and visual markers help distinguish fallbacks from permanent allocations.
Allocating Fallout Costs
Fallout costs are those that fail to map through primary allocation rules and remain stranded in an unassigned bucket. These unallocated costs can distort financial insights, understate total cost of services, and weaken trust in the TBM model.
To manage fallout, set up dedicated staging buckets that isolate these costs from fully allocated spend. Analyze these entries regularly to identify data quality issues, missing metadata, or logic gaps. Temporary allocations (such as pro rata splits) can help ensure completeness while you investigate root causes.
Over time, refine your data sources, enhance metadata tagging, and improve rule coverage to reduce fallout volumes.
Evaluating Allocation Quality
Evaluating allocation quality ensures that your TBM model remains credible, actionable, and aligned with enterprise goals. Quality evaluation is essential during initial model design, whenever allocation rules change, and during periodic reviews. A strong allocation builds trust with Finance and Business and avoids disputes over fairness or accuracy. The evaluation process relies on clear criteria that test the transparency, fairness, consistency, and resilience of each rule.
Practical Quality Check (Yes/No)
- [ ] Can I trace every dollar from source to end-user?
- [ ] Can I explain the rule to a non-technical stakeholder in 30 seconds?
- [ ] Would this logic survive an audit or CFO challenge?
- [ ] Are all shared costs fairly and proportionally allocated?
- [ ] Will this rule still work with twice the number of apps/units?
If you answered Yes to 4 or more, your allocation logic is solid. Less than 3? It’s time to rework or replace.
Use the 5 Tests of a Good TBM Allocation:
Test | What It Means | How to Check It |
Transparent | Stakeholders can trace where the cost came from | Can you explain the rule source ➝ logic ➝ destination? |
Relevant | Allocation reflects real-world usage or demand | Are you using meaningful drivers (e.g., GB, user count)? |
Defensible | Logic is fair to Finance and Business | Would your CFO or BU leader agree with the logic? |
Consistent | Method is uniformly applied | Are the same rules used across apps/towers? |
Scalable | Works with growing model complexity | Can the rule scale to 1,000 apps or 30 units without breaking? |
Allocation Maturity Progression
As a TBM model evolves, so does the sophistication of its allocation logic. At first, organizations may rely on basic methods that are easy to explain and implement. These models provide transparency and are helpful for basic cost visibility. As needs increase and complexity grows—either from a business, technology, or stakeholder demand perspective—the model must progress.
In early phases, allocations are typically direct or fixed. These methods are often hardcoded, manually updated, and provide minimal insight beyond visibility. When stakeholders begin to question fairness or relevance—or when the organization needs more accurate unit cost metrics—teams transition to intermediate stages that use shared services and basic consumption drivers. Advanced stages incorporate detailed activity-based or weighted allocations, often informed by KPIs or operational metrics. The most mature models use automated, dynamic allocations that evolve alongside the business and support strategic planning and performance reporting.
Progression is triggered by business needs: poor stakeholder trust, internal chargeback requirements, cloud cost optimization, or new executive mandates. Mature organizations audit their allocation maturity annually and prioritize upgrades where misalignment, opacity, or manual effort is highest.
Audit & Governance Practices
Allocations that aren’t regularly reviewed and governed risk losing stakeholder trust and creating downstream confusion. Governance ensures allocation rules remain relevant, consistent, and fair. Audits confirm that cost flows are working as intended and comply with internal controls.
TBM teams should document the source, target, and driver of every allocation rule, store that logic in a centralized location, and make it available for stakeholder review. Reviews should occur during model build, after significant logic changes, and at least annually. Involving Finance and Business Unit representatives in these reviews helps validate fairness and defensibility.
Governance should also include naming conventions, version tracking, and recertification protocols to manage changes over time.
Join the TBM community: where innovators and leaders converge
The TBM Council is your gateway to a treasure trove of knowledge: think cutting-edge research papers, insightful case studies, and vibrant community forums where you can exchange ideas, tackle challenges, and celebrate successes with fellow practitioners.
We’re calling on organizations and forward-thinking individuals to dive into the TBM community. Participate in our events, engage in our discussions, and tap into a vast reservoir of knowledge. This isn’t just about networking; it’s about contributing to and benefiting from the collective wisdom in navigating the dynamic world of cloud computing.
